Section 230 Antitrust

Section 230 going nowhere but google has true antitrust risk munster says.

Section 230 antitrust. The house judiciary antitrust subcommittee should be asking questions about section 230 as it is one of the reasons for the dominance of a small number of digital platforms. Section 230 generally provides immunity for website publishers from third party content. Section 230 going nowhere but google has true antitrust risk munster says jayson derrick 6 18 2020 doj seeks to defend trump in suit by e. 1a big tech have become gatekeepers over things like commerce and speech says reporter cecilia kang.

But it s a law. The house judiciary antitrust subcommittee should be asking questions about section 230 as it is one of the reasons for the dominance of a small number of digital platforms. The justice department and 11 states filed an antitrust case against google that accusing the company of using anticompetitive tactics to. Section 230 of the communications decency act which was passed in 1996 says an interactive computer service can t be treated as the publisher or speaker of third party content.

A fourth category of reform is to make clear that federal antitrust claims are not and were never intended to be covered by section 230 immunity. Section 230 is confusing. Section 230 is a piece of internet legislation in the united states passed into law as part of the communications decency act cda of 1996 a common name for title v of the telecommunications act of 1996 formally codified as section 230 of the communications act of 1934 at 47 u s c. Google s antitrust lawsuit section 230 interview human trafficking jeffrey epstein josh peck occult prophetic news technology world events silent cry.

There are a handful of tech. Jean carroll who has accused him of sexual assault. The darker side of trafficking feat. Social media through section 230 and algorithms has given trolls and slanderers vast audiences for their falsehoods.

The google antitrust suit and section 230.